Defending Discrimination and Defined Communities

What would you say to someone who told you that if you did not date short, fat, redheads of the opposite sex then you would be carted off to jail for discrimination and if you resisted you would be shot on the spot? I think most sane people would be adamantly against use of force to make a person choose a person they would like to date or be in a relationship with. Should people be forced to invite people into their homes that they do not want there for whatever reason? If The Black Panthers are holding a meeting, it would be unlikely that the Ku Klux Klan would be allowed to attend. If the Pagans are having a party at their motorcycle club headquarters, then you will not see any Hells Angels at that party. If you are holding a fundraiser at your home for lung cancer awareness, you probably will not have smokers walking around and mingling at the event. The point is that people discriminate everyday. People discriminate when they pick the food they want to eat. We discriminate when we decide what neighborhoods we enter and places we travel based on the crime statistics and culture of those areas. We discriminate when we choose our friends. Do I want dishonest troublemakers as friends or do I want to be friends with people who have integrity? Women’s and Men’s Clubs discriminate. Nudist colonies discriminate. The Vatican does not allow Jewish Rabbis to join the priesthood. Modeling agencies do not allow 400 lb. 5’1′ women with acne to walk down the runways. The NBA is mostly made up of tall athletic black men. Life insurance companies discriminate against men, smokers, skydivers, and freelance journalists who travel to The Middle East. They are a higher risk so they must pay a higher premium or be declined altogether.  People discriminate when they date. Gay people and heterosexuals alike discriminate against a large percentage of the population. Should we call them bigoted? People might say that’s involuntary discrimination and they do not have a choice. It’s still discrimination and it should be allowed to be freely expressed in our actions. Furthermore, there is always a choice. A person does not have to date. Force can only be used to eliminate your choices. But even if you do have a choice, why is it acceptable to use government violence to limit or abolish your choices? The problem arises when it is a business or institution that offers service to the public. Your freedom of association and choice should not be taken away from you with the threat of aggression from The State if you put a cash register and an advertisement on your private property. People have every right to discriminate based on self ownership of their body and the legitimate acquisition of privately owned property.

In an anarcho-capitalist society you might have businesses that discriminate based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation and creed. Many people say this would be a horrible place to live. A society that discriminates based on outward appearance and attributes that have been designated by nature and the circumstances into which a person is born seems harsh. I think racism and homophobia are ignorant belief systems. Discrimination based on race or gender alone without considering any negative sociological, behavioral, and cultural tendencies exhibited by these certain classes would be irrational. Nevertheless, the free market will weed out businesses that put signs in their windows which state they will not serve certain types of people. If an Israeli grocer will not serve Palestinians, and vice versa, they will lose business and people that are denied services will go somewhere else. If a Christian or Muslim business does not want to serve homosexuals the same scenario applies. A homosexual horticulturist may only prepare flower arrangements for gay couples. That’s fine. These  businesses will not be around very long. Businesses that do not strive to accommodate all consumers will lose money to their competitors and will ultimately fail. The free market can effectively regulate racism and bigotry without the use of violence. Voluntary exchange works just fine. There are instances when it is rational and moral to discriminate along the lines of race, religion, age, gender and sexual orientation. This is based on a substantial percentage of that particular group’s members showing negative attributes and behaviors that can be consistently observed and qualitatively and quantitatively regarded as general rules for the specific group in question.

Let’s say a taxi cab driver or owner of a taxi cab service chooses to discriminate which neighborhoods he goes into to pick people up based on crime statistics. This driver would be justified in making that decision. Furthermore, if they do decide to provide services in these neighborhoods but they selectively refuse to pickup young black males they would also be justified in discriminating this way. White and black cab drivers have put this policy into practice based on experience. It is their moral obligation to protect their life and property and they can only do this by lessening the risk of violent assaults, robberies, and sometimes murder. The statistics are very clear in showing that most violent crimes like rape, assault, theft, and murder are committed by young black males. The opposing side will say that stats can be manipulated to fit an agenda, however these conclusions are cut and dry. Murder is murder. Stealing is stealing. Why would victims, some of which are black, make up stories about who assaulted and robbed them? It’s illogical and does not make sense. Ghetto merchants will charge higher prices for merchandise in low income crime ridden neighborhoods where minorities live. Their insurance is high so their prices must be high. Crime would need to go down and if thugs and barbarians stop burning down their neighborhoods during race riots you might have a favorable change in prices. Restaurants can say we do not allow children in our establishment. They are noisy, disruptive, and lack fine dining etiquette. This is fine and acceptable in any free society. In an anarcho-capitalist society you will have restrictive communities. They are also referred to as covenant communities and I will refer to them as defined communities. They have a right based on private property and voluntary contracts to restrict people and behaviors for whatever reason they feel necessary. There are communities that might be atheistic or secular and they do not want dogmatic religionists poisoning the well of free rational thought. They can restrict the faithful from their communities. You might have a community that prides itself on traditional marriage. They will unapologetically ban gays and communists. You might have a community that wants to preserve African culture and traditions. They may invite western cultures to visit and learn about their culture but they can also restrict people living there who may come into conflict with their values. These examples would be found in an anarchist society with thousands or tens of thousands of communities living the way they believe is the best way to live. There will be gays allowed in more culturally conservative communities as long as they are not militant and do not try to tear away at that fabric of that community. You may even find secular communities allowing religious people to live amongst them, as long as they keep their faiths and beliefs they find comforting to themselves. They would probably live in a community that upheld religion though, unless there was some endearing and intangible benefit of the religious person joining the secular community. These are all voluntary sub communities, organizations, associations, and clubs that make up a much larger libertarian anarchist society. It’s all voluntary and that’s why it is moral. The argument can be made that certain communities will thrive and others will self destruct. The communistic communities will be a disaster. The communities that embrace free love, egalitarianism, communal property, hedonism, drug use, multiculturalism, militant homosexuality, religious fanaticism of one variety or another, abortion on demand, diversity, prostitution, hardcore environmentalism, will suffer and eventually implode. We got a taste of this at Occupy. The societies that value free trade, capitalism, secularism, individualism, private property, decency, and a western bourgeois class structure will flourish and prosper immensely. They would have to restrict marauders, beggars, social justice crusaders, commies, drug addicts, and other misfits from entering this voluntarily designed and completely privatized aristocratic mini civilization. The miscreants, bad decision makers, aggressive pseudo intellectual leftists seeking “equality” through theft, and the bottom feeders must be left to fend for themselves on the fringes of productive societies.

You might hear that discrimination is wrong and that government must step in to enforce anti-discrimination laws. The government discriminates on a colossal level and when they do it they have the law and violent enforcement on their side. Jim Crow was forced segregation that could not be escaped in The South. The government encourages and imports third worlders into communities and schools that have been paid for with stolen income through taxes and regulations. This is forced integration. The government discriminates through affirmative action laws. These are violations of people’s right to choose. People will organically segregate themselves into different communities since they feel more comfortable being around people who share the same values and culture. That’s observable now on college campuses and in communities all over. Some people will assimilate and mix. Either way these choices are voluntary and should be void of any government coercion. The right to restrict people from entering your private property for any reason is legitimate under private property law. The government on the other hand uses force when deciding who is prohibited from discriminating against protected classes of people like gays, blacks, and women. This is discrimination by the government. Anti-discrimination laws are in fact discrimination laws backed by the murderous and thieving government. Moreover, affirmative action laws and other quota laws are blatant discrimination laws enacted and enforced by the same criminal organization. Discrimination based on the freedom to choose and private property is an innate human behavior. You own your body and property. The threat  of fines, jail, and murder for not participating in commerce with someone is the epitome of violence perpetrated by The State. It’s time to defend discrimination.

Advertisements

Earth Day is a Religious Holiday for Eco-Marxists

This short composition is not an attempt to convince climate alarmists and environmental socialists that anthropogenic global warming is a giant fabrication by world governments to bring down capitalism. I am not writing this article to sway greenies, who have shortsighted opinions on environmental issues, that what they believe to be fact is based on junk science created by liars, hypocrites, power mad elitists, and pseudo scientists. These eco-tyrants would love nothing more than to bring their leftist global agenda of central planning and ultimate decision making power to fruition on a mammoth and global scale. They will stop at nothing to bring down the last vestiges of the greatest economic and political system on earth, that is, capitalism with private property rights. It would be a waste of time to try to persuade these ideological automatons, that make up the green movement, with compelling arguments against fascistic environmental initiatives enacted by government leaders and supported by so called environmentalists. They do not want the truth. The ends justify the means for these sociopaths who can be separated into two main groups with defining characteristics overlapping between these groups. The first group is the watermelons or enviro-socialists who are using climate change claims, pollution, toxic waste, and overpopulation to bring about redistribution of property, income, and wealth to achieve socialism under the guise of good intentions and the use of fear mongering to prevent “the end of days” if nothing is done. They are watermelons because their outward appearance is green but they are die hard communist red on the inside. The other group are the earth worshippers and the eco-religionists. They will defend the earth, wildlife, and all environmental issues like a snake handler in Tennessee defends his lord and savior Jesus Christ from any criticism. I am writing to expose these lunatics for who they are and what they represent and to reach rational people who cherish capitalism and private property with the intention of further cementing their convictions.

There are scores of people around the world who know that the Eco-Marxists are on a mission to bring civilization back to pre-industrial times. The truth is that anthropogenic global warming is a major con perpetrated by an evil group of people to control large swaths of populations. The temperature data has been distorted and tampered with to fit neatly into the made up story of man made global warming. The computer models have been adjusted on countless occasions to create results that match what the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is predicting for future climatic periods around the planet. Their predictions never come true. The truth is that the earth is not overpopulated and there are huge areas of unused land in North America alone that are owned by government. These areas can be homesteaded and put to good use. Instead it’s controlled by government and the result is overgrowth of forests and dead brush that cause raging wild fires which destroy habitats. The truth is that animals and wildlife do not have the same rights as humans. In fact, they do not have any rights at all since they can not petition for them and they survive only instinctually and without the ability to reason using logical deduction. I do not support torture and cruelty towards sentient creatures and I think it is immoral to kill animals in an inhumane fashion. Nevertheless, humans are omnivores and have an absolute right to raise animals for food, as well as, hunting and killing them for sustenance. Animals can be taken as property and there are only recognizable human rights. Otherwise animals would violate the rights of humans during instances where they come into contact with them and kill them. They would also be violating the rights of other animals they hunt and kill for survival. They would not even know they committed these “offenses”. Should we have courts for animals? This is what some green nut jobs believe should happen in their twisted Utopia. The truth is that Rachel Carson is responsible for deaths caused by the infectious disease known as malaria when she helped get DDT banned to “save” the birds. DDT was a pesticide that dramatically decreased the number of malarial cases around the world. Carson believed it was harmful to birds and we would eventually have a “Silent Spring” with no birds singing and chirping all as a result of DDT and its made up harmful effects on the environment. She put animals before humans. The truth is that Al Gore is an environmental mobster who made hundreds of millions on the lies and convenient mistruths of global warming. This guy should be called Al Gorepone and he should be arrested, tried, and convicted on racketeering charges, fraud, theft, and murder. People around the world have died as a result of the policies and laws this crook has helped implement based on vast number of deceptions. This guy would make Bugsy Siegel look like a humanitarian. There are loads of hypocrites like Al Gorepone who say one thing and do another. They sip champagne on private jets while the peasants are told they must stop burning fossil fuels and to limit their use of toilet paper to one sheet a visit and one flush a day. The government elite and their apparatchiks do not obey the authoritarian laws they pass. They do not follow their socialist message for the “greater good”. These laws only apply to the serfs and sheeple.

Environmental socialism is a septic plague which seeks to destroy civilization and humanity. These commies use environmentalism to advance their collectivist agenda. Then there is the hardcore green movement and authoritative environmentalists who put animals, pollution, climate change, CO2 emissions, and wind turbines before humans. They are dogmatic religionists and one of the most dangerous of their kind. They are right in line with Islamists and The Westboro Baptist Church. Their cult is void of any specks of reason. The environmental movement based on private property and contracts is righteous and is the only way to look at environmental issues. The Eco-Nazis, or hardcore greenies, are polytheistic believers. There main god is the earth and its environment. The prophets and disciples are Maurice Strong, Paul Ehrlich, Al Gore, Rachel Carson, and Michael Mann. There are more who can be added to this list, but this is supposed to be a short essay. They deliver the gospel of earth worship chapter and verse in “scientific” journals, books, and public appearances. The churches and temples are the IPCC, college and university campuses, global warming and climate conferences, and the deceptive media corporations. These institutions and outlets that are feeding people with propaganda and sub par scientific theories use government workers, pseudo scientists funded by stolen taxes, and paid talking heads to disseminate this freedom stomping nonsense. The churchgoers are the Lilliputians and youngsters on college campuses who are conditioned to become climate activists armed with misinformation and threats of government violence as their weapons Their Holy Day is a holiday called Earth Day. On this day they join hands, march in solidarity, and sing songs about mother earth. They are supposed to be friendly peace loving hippies. But what’s peaceful about stealing money to bring about change based on false pretenses? What’s kind and loving about human population control by any means necessary? Sterilization and forced abortion has been talked about in these eco-circles and organizations. What’s good about controlling people through legislation and regulations? There is a startling resemblance to The Third Reich who were ardent environmentalists and population controllers not long ago. They did it for Germany. Now it’s done for our own good. It’s done to save the planet from pollution and capitalism with the backing of the tendentious and corrupt peer review process along with the bias of many so called scientific journals. The result is less freedom for regular individuals and more consolidation of power for a select group of elitists.

This giant rock called earth that orbits one out of billions of stars in our solar system, for the last 4.5 billion years, and will do so for another 5 billion years or so, is not conscious and aware of what humans are doing during their inhabitation of this planet. It does not have feelings and does not care about pollution and color coded recycling bins. This planet has endured asteroid collisions, tsunamis, cataclysmic earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Ninety-nine percent of all the species that ever existed on earth have gone extinct. In the grand cosmic scheme of things human beings are insignificant animals living on an insignificant planet. Human existence is finite and it has no purpose or meaning. We can give purpose and meaning to our short lives in many ways. We are free and rational beings governed by the laws of human nature. But it is extremely arrogant and evil to think that our purpose is to save the planet from human beings. The eco-maniacs will steal, murder, control, and shackle mankind with the hope of achieving this ludicrous objective. The universe does not even know we exist. We are not that important in the “eyes” of the cosmos. I only believe in respecting human rights in private property when it comes to preserving the environment. Contracts, private ownership of land, and private courts could solve air pollution and waste disposal. It would not be to save the planet. That’s just idiotic. Who cares about green energy subsidized by the government tax expropriators? Let the market decide. Who wants to sort through their garbage to avoid fines in order to recycle? Screw recycling. Capitalism and private property is the answer to poverty and pollution, not bureaucratic climate change peddlers who want to enslave the masses. This tyrannical hardcore religion called the green movement is a hindrance to human development and advancements in our civilization. It’s irrational just like any other pontifical credo. It must be peacefully stopped before we all become slaves to an oblate spheroid named Gaia for no purpose other than to stifle human productivity, devolve as a species, and give superior decision making powers and stolen wealth to the global statists. Their plan is not to save the planet. They want to rule it. The enviro-religionists want to save the planet. They want to conserve every ecosystem and eradicate every pollutant and polluter from existence. They will violate human rights with the use of deadly force if need be to achieve this heinous goal. Religion can make ordinary and otherwise rational people do extremely violent and irrational things.